Skip to content

Mortgage loan file forms, by number

A closed mortgage file is a stack of named artifacts, each completed by a different party for a different reason. This index gives the purpose, the completing party, and the post-closing QC test for the ones that generate the most findings.

What the operating record should preserve

Preserve the source

Keep the population, file evidence, and controlling guidance available beside the review.

Reperform the control

Store the inputs, method, rule version, and result another qualified reviewer would need.

Own the conclusion

Keep materiality, rationale, disposition, and corrective action with the accountable reviewer.

Scope follows the loan, not the list. No file contains everything below. Build the review scope from the product, channel, occupancy, income type and agency, then test the documents that scope actually requires.

The index

FormNameCompleted byThe test that finds defects
IRS 4506-CIVES Request for Transcript of Tax ReturnBorrower signs, lender submits through an IVES participantYears and form numbers cover the income used; transcript reconciles to the returns in the file
SSA-89Authorization to Release SSN VerificationNumber holder signs, lender submits through CBSV or eCBSVRequired by policy where triggered, consent still valid, no-match resolved
Fannie Mae 1005Request for Verification of EmploymentLender requests, employer completes and returns directlyNever routed through the borrower; earnings support the qualifying income
Fannie Mae 1084Cash Flow AnalysisLender or underwriterRecalculated from the returns; add-backs and access to business income supported
Freddie Mac 91Income CalculationsLender or underwriterRecalculated under Guide 5304.1; stability determination documented
VA 26-8937Verification of VA BenefitsLender requests, VA respondsFunding fee exemption supported by a VA determination, and the fee charged matches
Fannie Mae 1076Condominium Project QuestionnaireHomeowners association or management agentCompleted by the association, current at decision, critical repairs resolved
HUD 92900-AHUD/VA Addendum to the URLABorrower, lender, and the DE underwriterBorrower executions at application and closing; DE signature with CHUMS identification

Why the completing party matters more than the content

Read the four columns above in order and a pattern appears. In almost every case the defect that matters is not a wrong value in a box. It is that the wrong person filled the box in, or that the document travelled through a party it should not have touched.

  • A verification of employment that reached the employer by way of the borrower has lost the independence that made it evidence.
  • A condo questionnaire completed by the listing agent is a sales document wearing a compliance document’s clothing.
  • A Direct Endorsement approval without an identifiable underwriter is an approval nobody made.
  • A funding fee exemption applied from a borrower’s statement is an exemption VA never granted.

Design the review around provenance first and content second. A file that is complete but whose evidence came from interested parties is worse than a file with a missing page, because it looks finished.

Other forms a reviewer meets

These have no dedicated page here yet. They still belong on a scope checklist.

FormNameNote
Fannie Mae 1003Uniform Residential Loan ApplicationThe URLA itself. Compare the final version against the note, the addendum and the Closing Disclosure
Fannie Mae 1008Uniform Underwriting and Transmittal SummaryThe underwriter’s summary of the decision. Qualifying income and ratios here should match the calculation worksheets
Fannie Mae 1004Uniform Residential Appraisal ReportCompleted by the appraiser. QC reviews it, but the appraisal quality review is usually a separate discipline
Fannie Mae 1073Individual Condominium Unit Appraisal ReportThe condo counterpart to the 1004. Read it beside the project questionnaire
Fannie Mae 1007Single-Family Comparable Rent ScheduleSupports rental income on a one-unit investment property
Freddie Mac 92Net Rental Income CalculationsThe Freddie Mac rental worksheet that pairs with Form 91
Closing DisclosureIntegrated closing disclosure under Regulation ZTiming, tolerance and receipt evidence are their own body of work

Turning the index into a review

A scope list is not a review. To make it one, each row needs four things recorded separately: whether the document was required for this loan, whether it is present, whether the completing party was acceptable, and what the reperformed test returned. Collapsing those into a single yes or no is how files pass review while carrying the defect the review existed to find.

Keep the source page reference with every result. A reviewer six months later, or an examiner, should be able to open the finding, open the cited page, and reach the same conclusion without asking anyone what happened.

For the sequence these documents are reviewed inside, read the post-closing QC checklist. For the agency framing, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac post-closing QC requirements.

Reviewed against primary sources

Keep decisions human and evidence explicit.

Translate guidance into a review record that preserves what happened, who decided, and which source controlled.

Primary references

Confirm requirements against current source material.

Requirements and vendor capabilities change. These sources were reviewed July 31, 2026. Confirm current source material, product scope, commercial terms, and your approved QC plan before changing a production process.

Common questions

What mortgage teams usually ask.

Why organize a QC reference by form number?

Because that is how the work arrives. A reviewer opens a file and encounters a 1005, a 4506-C and a 92900-A, not an abstract category called employment documentation. Indexing the review by artifact makes it possible to test whether each one was completed by the right party, at the right time, and reconciled to the rest of the file.

Does every closed loan contain all of these?

No. The set varies by product, channel, occupancy, borrower income type and agency. A conventional W-2 purchase and a self-employed FHA condo refinance share very few of these documents. The review scope should be driven by the loan's own attributes.

Are these forms required by the agencies?

Some are and some are not. A 92900-A is required on an FHA file. A Form 1084 is a calculation aid the lender may or may not use. Treat the distinction carefully, because a finding against an optional worksheet is a different conversation from a finding against a required certification.

Where does the authority for any of this sit?

With the current agency guide, handbook or regulation, and with the lender's own approved QC plan. This library is an operating reference for building the evidence a decision needs. It is not a substitute for either.

From evidence to conclusion

We are building QC software for small lenders.

ExactClose is in development. Tell us how your post-close cycle runs and what it has to produce.

Contact the team See exact pricing